7. It said "Awaiting AE recommendation" for a while under status. Pending major or minor revisions = Author revisions are in progress. the secret commonwealth fairies does trader joe's sell liquor. Dear Mr Smith, Thank you for your letter regarding my manuscript entitled "Effect of Changing Weather Patterns on Home Insurance Policies: Clients Left Out in the Cold?". Frequently asked questions. decision pending after with editorkartoffeln gasgrill rezept. The decision on a resubmission will not be "Reject/Resubmit: major revisions needed and new external review required". This is a provisional acceptance, pending final checks for formatting and technical requirements . It has changed today from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". Accepted manuscripts are then copy-edited and English-edited internally. The decision letter is delivered to the author via email. Making an editorial decision. It looks like the Associate/Managing Editor (AE/ME) reached a decision on your paper after the first review, but that decision was changed/rescinded by the Editor-in-Chief (EIC). . The process involves both the journal editors and external expert reviewers, who evaluate . These are editable by the Editor-in-Chief and Deputy Editors. I submitted a revised manuscript (only a few changes requested) to a journal, and have been signing in periodically to see what the status is. Reviewer 3 was less so but wrote essentially positive comments asking for some changes and clarifications. The Editor has made a decision and requested you revise the submission. Remain until you begin the process, the editor of pending petitions or applications after death the! 4a: Resubmission pending : Dove Editorial has communicated the Editor-in-Chief's decision to the author(s) and Dove is awaiting a revised and/or resubmitted manuscript. See . 1 Awaiting decision or settlement. The Taylor & Francis Author Services team is on hand to answer any questions you may have as you navigate the process of getting your article published in an academic journal. Reply. This status will remain until you begin the process of submitting your revision. Jun 15, 2009. More example sentences. Answer (1 of 6): I don' know if there is anything special about Springer journals but from submission to publication in a reputable journal can take as much as two years. pending editor decisionpeer revieweditorial memberfinal decisionmdpi. adjective. In these cases, the handling editor acts as a referee, considering the review comments, re-reading the manuscript, and making the decision as to how the manuscript will be processed. These stages tend to be moved through fairly swiftly as they are just the editorial team checking that your submission is suitable for . . pending definition: 1. about to happen or waiting to happen: 2. used to say that one thing must wait until another. No matter which decision you receive, be sure to read the entire decision letter carefully. More details about the editorial process can be found here. Revise. Across all Wolters Kluwer journals, the average time that a manuscript moves through the submission process from submission to first decision takes about 30 days, and to a final decision about 54 days, but this is dependent upon many factors and is different for each journal. In fact the so-called rejected rate, the . PNAS MS# 2013-08495 Decision Notification. (972) 861-9805. smith.editor@jchangweath.com. Sociologist4a3e. Reviewer 2 was positive providing constructive feedback. The Editor makes a final journal decision regarding publication of the current manuscript. Decisions letters are proofread in the order in which the manuscript was submitted. In many journals the decision does not fall solely on the editor, but papers are discussed to some extent by the editorial board. PS: I submitted my manuscript to a Nature journal. Editor invited - The journal is identifying potential editors for the submission. 76545 USA. From one comment on a forum, I read that this basically means that my manuscript was desk rejected. # Assigned in the last 2 weeks Comments. level 2 this screening is done by the editor. Revised Manuscripts: When a revised manuscript is submitted, the process is repeated. Last updated on April 27, 2022. Reviewers' Profile and Responsibilities 'nine cases were still pending'. It may be that a review report is deemed unsuitable or that the paper is directly rejected, in which case the authors may have started to respond to a report unnecessarily. . Pending editor decision = The Academic Editor is making a final decision. How long one should wait on an editor's decision depends on a variety of factors - your stature within your profession, the quality of the journal to which you submitted the manuscript, and the. In addition to the comments received from the review, editors also base their decisions on: . Question on PNAS review system. The editor sends a decision email to the author including any relevant reviewer comments. The editors evaluate the reviewers' comments and make a recommendation to the Editorial Board member, who makes the final decision to accept or reject your paper. March 3, 2020. The decision letter draft is submitted for proofreading by the journal's editorial staff. The editor-in-chief is primarily responsible for initial receipt of the manuscript and assignment to an associate editor. The Author is sent the decision. From the author's perspective, the decision by the editor is the long-awaited final event in the peer review process. : 5524350. Many pending credit card applications are resolved within a few days, though it can take . The Editorial office receives the reviewer comments and assesses them. Just now it says "awaiting EIC decision". 1. In the majority of cases, at least two reports will be received which are broadly in agreement, making it possible to assess reviewer comments easily and reach a straightforward decision. It's out of your hands. After peer review, the editor will consider feedback from the reviewers and then make a decision about the article. The stage of first review can take up to a year. I recently submitted a manuscript to PNAS and was a bit confused by their review system. Initially your manuscript will go through stages such as "Awaiting Admin Checklist" and/or "Awaiting Editor Assignment" depending on how new submissions are initially checked on the journal. Pending Recommendation Under Editor Review Under Editorial Board Review Quality Control .. Feb 11, 2021 Here is mine If "Pending Recommendation" comes immediately after "Under Review", then the paper was never sent to the reviewers and it will .. Editorial decision making and the peer review process. The journal's editor or editorial board considers the feedback provided by the peer reviewers and uses this information to arrive at a decision. Under these circumstances, further experiments or technical work are usually required to . The AFM is amended as follows. Placing your cursor under the stage will give you the reasons claims can go back to previous. But similar conditions in long days contact the editor and ask. Report Save Follow. 1007 bgb mittelbarer besitzer; hundemantel franzsische bulldogge; decision pending after with editor. Answer: A status change directly from "With editor" to "Decision in process" usually implies a desk rejection. First Steps. A manuscript's progression from submission to decision With . There will be some time between a manuscript entering the "Decision pending" queue and the contact author receiving the decision letter. 6. After the AE is assigned and before a decision is made, the status of a paper in the author's ScholarOne Manuscripts is always shown as "with associate editor". Manuscript submitted - The journal has received the submission and is screening it for basic technical requirements. 3. All journals pending. The Editor-in-Chief (EiC) oversees all editorial processing and sets the direction of the journal. The Decision is Communicated. If you are a new Editor or a Guest Editor or if you have not handled a manuscript for some time, this guide provides step-by-step assistance for the editorial process. This means that you may receive the message that your application is "pending" or "under review.". 9. Co-authors cannot view this information within Editorial Manager, however many journals do copy all authors on decision letters. Manuscripts are handled using Hindawi's online system. There is no way of knowing whether the reviews they already have are borderline or just of . The time to render a first decision averages about 43 days, but times vary depending on how long it takes for the editor to receive and assess reviews. 2022: Motivation: Desk rejection with two lines of editor general . The handling Academic Editor or staff editor makes the final decision on each manuscript. 'The Archbishop did not reveal if further settlements were pending.'. In the majority of cases, at least two reports will be received which are broadly in agreement, making it possible to assess reviewer comments easily and reach a straightforward decision. The Assigned Editor field will only include assigned Editor role, not EIC or Admin role type. "The paper exposes a compelling theory on a fundamental and challenging . If the paper clears the initial screening, it is sent for peer review; else, it is rejected. Essays, academic papers, thesis, or blog posts can be easily checked through the online editor. At the "pending decision" stage, all the reviews are in and the editor is about to make a decision based on those reviews. When the decision is finalized, you will receive a direct email with the overall editorial decision, Editor and/or reviewer comments, and further instructions. decision pending after with editor. This appears only if the Journal Insights page is live for the journal. What sometimes happens is that reviewer recommendations diverge widely. If needed, you can still make changes to your report after it has been submitted, up until the Interactive Review Forum is activated by the associate editor. Malaysia is still reviewing the viability of a temporary cut of a crude palm oil export tax, the Commodities Ministry said on Friday, after Indonesia lifted an export ban that has rattled the market. Box 707. The editor will routinely send manuscripts with such reviews to additional reviewers, who in turn, have been known to return the recommendations of "accept" and "major revision". To save the efforts of authors we only provide review reports after receiving all reports and making a decision. the manuscript is deemed suitable for publication pending a . To contact the Editor, you must be the Corresponding Author. I will say this, if the decision is unfavorable you need to make an appointment to see an experienced SSA attorney as soon as possible. MDPI pending editor decision. Answer: Not necessarily. Thanks for your valuable answers as my own experience, pending decision after with editor, it means rejection/send back to the author. 6 years ago. Once a paper is submitted to a journal, it goes through an initial screening process. Of course, we followed the advice (+1 month on the same manuscript). 1. Under review - The handling editor has begun to invite peer reviewers to evaluate . Reviewer 1 and the editor were detailed and constructive. It could also mean that one of the reviews they got was a one liner and they are decent enough to not send it to you and are looking for a replacement. 2013-07-31. These stages tend to be moved through fairly swiftly as they are just the editorial team checking that your submission is suitable for . Decision in Process: This means that the reviewer comments are being assessed and the Editor-in-Chief is in the process of finalizing a decision about the manuscript. A decision could affect future planes. Bottom line: chill out. You can only be patient at this point in time. Hi all. Editors are responsible for making manuscript decisions based upon reviewer reports and their own reading of the manuscript. 8 2019-11-13 00:45 . 5. If your paper is sent out for review, your member editor or guest editor selects recognized subject experts to review your work. : 183. Spunky. The Corresponding Author can view the comments from Editors and reviewers in the decision email they received, or find that letter within Editorial Manager as described below. . When broken down by categories of reviewer recommendation, there was no significant difference in the outcome of papers from China and English-speaking countries; that is . Academic Editors at Hindawi are responsible for deciding whether a manuscript should be published as an article in a journal. comments may be sent to the associate editor. . Now a journal has accepted to review our paper, and here are the status of the paper: "Under review" 43 days "Ready for Decision" 6 days "Decision Pending" 13 Days Guest Editors are not able to take decisions on their own papers which will instead be assigned to a suitable Editorial Board member. 2. Completed - Accept/Reject 20.6 Approval of pending petitions or applications after death of the qualifying relative. See How do I send an email about my submission? (9) . : Motivation: Desk rejection with two lines of editor general decision pending after with editor the Editorial Team begin. However, one journal suggested that we need to improve the paper. If the reviews differ widely, the editor may invite an additional reviewer so as to get an extra opinion before making a decision. A report is highly critical of how the FAA exempted Boeing's 737 MAX from pilot warning system standards. Editors receive an email when they are . The acceptance rate is currently 14%. Editors are responsible for making manuscript decisions based upon reviewer reports and their own reading of the manuscript. AFM. It usually takes around 48 hours. You have only 60 days to appeal and unfavorable decision and, this is key, you have to choose between appealing the ALJ decision and starting a new case. : 87.8. Reviewing is all done voluntarily by academics, so it does not take precedenc. Report: Pending : The author is being contacted about the Editor-in-Chief's decision. Completed - Accept/Reject Implementation . approval of a still-pending petition or application. River Rapids, Oregon. You ended the message I responded to with "That may be what send your claim back to the Gathering of Evidence stage." It does, and almost exclusively that's back to Gathering of Evidence, not Under Review. The peer review process is a fundamental part of research publishing. During review, you will also have the option to submit PDF files to complement your review. revolution; betreuungsbro itzehoe. Those things often take time. A final decision on publication is deferred, pending the authors' response to the referees' comments. (app) . 2 yr. ago. Although every author wants to have his or her work accepted for publication and to see it in print-on paper or digital, everybody realizes that acceptance is not possible every time. IOS. There are three basic types of decisions: Accept, Revise, and Reject. Journal of Changing Weather. This means that the manuscript has been assigned to an editor and is waiting for the editor's acceptance. When the decision is finalized, you will receive a direct email with the overall editorial decision, Editor and/or reviewer comments, and further instructions. true temper snow shovel replacement blade; dct steganography python code Ultimately, it is the editor's task, rather than that of the reviewer, to decide whether a manuscript will be accepted, revised or rejected after review. On the fourth day, it went from "Under Editorial Board Review" to "Pending Recommendation". This indicates those manuscripts that are currently with an editor until a final decision of reject or accept is rendered. Share. Reviewer 2 was extremely brief, but this was in part because they liked the paper. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America: n/a: n/a: 20.0 days: n/a: n/a: n/a: Rejected (im.) #3. Learn more. Pending decision = A first assessment will be made by the Academic Editor. aaliyah: the princess of r&b stream deutsch; butan gasflasche entsorgen . If your paper is sent out for review, your member editor or guest editor selects recognized subject experts to review your work. The Associate Editor submits her/his own comments and recommendation to the Editor. Editor Declined Invitation Decision Letter Being Prepared This is then sent to the Editor-in-Chief for a final decision. The handling editor considers all the returned reviews before making an overall decision. If you are waiting considerably longer to receive a decision from the Editor than the average review speed indicates, you can contact the Editor. We revised it and submitted it after a week. pending: [adjective] not yet decided : being in continuance. Editor Invited: This step is optional and may not occur in all journals. Stage 4: Decision Resubmissions are directed Acceptance decisions are taken by an academic editor (the Editor-in-Chief, a Guest Editor, or another suitable Editorial Board member). At the "pending decision" stage, all the reviews are in and the editor is about to make a decision based on those reviews. Note that the time it takes for an editor to make a decision on . chapter 20.5(c)(7), as added by this PM, for complete guidance on this issue. & # x27 ; the other does not is primarily responsible for initial receipt of 46! In april, they got back To us with "major revisions" needed. Associate Editors (AEs) solicit external peer-reviews of manuscripts using single blind peer review and make an initial recommendation of the publication priority for each manuscript. Revise. 'Wait until after the opposition has passed later on Wednesday before making a final decision on a pending matter.'. The Editor has made a decision and requested you revise the submission. P.O. The EIC (or even both, after a consultation) may have decided that your paper needs an additional review for some reason. Editor assigned . Note: these comments are viewable by the other Deputy Editors and Editor-in-Chief of the journal. If the previous editorial decision was B, only the editor will see the author responses and will make a decision based on them. (a . Making an editorial decision. Authors will also be notified by email when a decision is made. Reviewers will assess the technical soundness and scientific validity of your methods, analysis and interpretation, all of which must be appropriate, properly conducted, ethically robust and fully supported by the data. decision pending after with editor. Of the 2093 papers with at least two peer-reviewers, papers from English-speaking countries had a marginally significant higher acceptance rate than did articles from China (51.1% vs. 41.7%; 2 = 3.27, df = 1, p < 0.07). One file per question can be submitted. The Editor has made a decision and requested you revise the submission. It is likely that the change "under review" -> "decision pending" means that referee (s) report (s) were received, and now the editor has to make the decision. It is against TMI policy to reveal the status of a paper under review. This status will remain until you begin the process of submitting your revision. One reviewer thinks the article is a good fit for the journal; the other does not. It can take from a week up to 2-3 weeks. Select Editor 6 years ago # QUOTE 13 GOOD 6 NO GOOD !